Monday, December 22, 2008

Theory of maximum enjoyment

Theory of maximum enjoyment is the theory of my life. According to this theory:




"ENJOYMENT OF MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE FOR THE MAXIMUM DURATION OF TIME SHOULD BE MAXIMUM AND DESTRUCTION OF MAXIMUM NUMBER OF PEOPLE FOR THE MAXIMUM DURATION OF TIME SHOULD BE MINIMUM"






Before arguing about my theory it is very important to understand it. I assure that if one has understand this theory there will be no argument, no discussion on this theory. according to theory of maximum enjoyment , I added enjoyment. One can ask me have we come here on earth to enjoy only. I believe Yes we are here only to enjoy. this enjoyment should not be of maximum no. of people and should not be for short time. why do we do work? to eat food and we enjoy enjoy food empty stomach hurts, that is destructive. Why should we respect others? Because respecting others earns respect. earning respect gives enjoyment. Here Destruction is anything that hurts any one. I may not be able to make my theory to be understood by just writing here. But I will try by explaining this theory by examples.


According to theory of maximum enjoyment if some lie is beneficial for someone and not hurting anyone it should be spoken. if some stealing is not hurting anyone it can be done. everything can be realized by this theory . I can describe everything with this theory. I don't know about any religion . Only this theory is my religion. This theory includes all my principles. I have dreamt all my life on the basis of this theory. I did a lot of things that may not be good according to others , but I did, because they did not hurt anyone. I did never read any religious book like Geeta, kuran, ved . and I don't think that I need to read these books. I try to drive every thing from this theory. If some thing that is written in holy books and does not fit in theory of maximum enjoyment , I believe that is wrong.


I follow only those laws which fits in theory of maximum enjoyment. if defying some law is not hurting anyone then why should it be followed ? I am not saying that some rules and laws are wrong. But in fact these are incomplete due to exceptions. let's take a small example it is in Indian Law to keep in left in the road. but if road is empty then why shouldn't be keep right as it not hurting anyone. Indian Law does not explain this, but this can be derived from theory of maximum enjoyment. this is very Small and simple example. Big problems can be solved by this theory. important thing is that one has to understand it properly, how to use, how to implement this theory. One more important thing- this theory is applicable if one has to survive in this world. I follow this theory because I have to survive in this world. But this theory is not the realty, I will explain this realty, means what I think about realty in my next blogs. this may be contradictory, but leave it I'll come with this in next blog.


As I have cleared it this theory will be more clear by examples. I want to introduce one live example here. One of my friends Nishit follows this theory or in other words he fits in theory of maximum enjoyment. If you want to realize this theory meet him and spend at least 1 month with him. he enjoys everything. He does not do any thing wrong. he does not care any rule or regulation. but he is enjoying his life up to its peak.
If I don't have work in office , if for a month there is no work for me, but officially it compulsory to go to office. But no one knows that weather I am coming to office or not. then Why should I come to office. I will not go to office and in the last of month I will provide all proofs of my presence in office. Then company will be happy and I will also be happy. That is good implementation of theory of maximum enjoyment. but no one should be unhappy. This is explained only by the theory of maximum enjoyment.
If some one has to follow this theory of maximum enjoyment, he/she has to filter all his/her decisions through this theory. I follow this theory. I don't have any other principle except this theory. because at some moment of time every has to amend his/her principles due to some exceptions. If some one always speaks truth and he is always ready to save others life. some day if his lie can save any one life. Then he will be forced to amend his principle.

5 comments:

Sharma, Nishit said...

Welcome to Blogging world...Gr8 stuff from you...i expected theory frm your side...Actually evrything is good but the point where u said that why should we not walk on right when road is empty?...I think the other way 'coz walking on other side, u may encounter some other person coming from other side and u will hv to immediately change direction to avoid hurting yourself..also u will hv to be careful and avoid colliding with others...so it's better to move on your side with enjoying your Puff and your gultan by the side...Keep Blogging and when u will write about Naseebo Darling

Deepak Bagga said...

Yoy are right, but I wrote "if road is empty" means road is totaly empty. if you have any doubt about the empyness of road and you are going on right side means you are not following the theory properly. then according to theory you should keep left............

Tarun Goel said...

Oho, and where will you find this "totally empty" road in INDIA??
Leave alone India, where in the whole fucking world?? :D

Deepak Bagga said...

Empty road is an exceptioal case. My theory works in all cases, may be normal or exceptional.

Tarun Goel said...

Now you are saying empty road is an exceptional case, then why are you citing an exceptional case as an example. You want readers to understand your theory or to confuse them?? :D